Ecosystem benefits of urban woody plants for sustainable green space planning: a case study from Wroclaw
Andersson, E. et al. Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem services. AMBIO 43, 445–453 (2014).
Google Scholar
Elmqvist, T. et al. Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14, 101–108 (2015).
Google Scholar
MEA. 137 (2005).
Rall, L. et al. A Typology of Urban Green Spaces, Eco-System Services Provisioning Services and Demands. 68 (2015).
Dobbs, C., Kendal, D. & Nitschke, C. R. Multiple ecosystem services and disservices of the urban forest establishing their connections with landscape structure and sociodemographics. Ecol. Ind. 43, 44–55 (2014).
Google Scholar
Paudel, S. & States, S. L. Urban green spaces and sustainability: exploring the ecosystem services and disservices of grassy lawns versus floral meadows. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 84, 127932 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ćwik, A. et al. Ecosystem services and disservices of vegetation in recreational urban blue–green spaces—Some recommendations for greenery shaping. Forests 12, 1077 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gupta, A. & De, B. A systematic review on urban blue-green infrastructure in the South Asian region: recent advancements, applications, and challenges. Water Sci. Technol. 89, 382–403 (2024).
Google Scholar
Nowak, D. J. & Crane, D. E. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environ. Pollut. 116, 381–389 (2002).
Google Scholar
Schmidt, K., Sachse, R. & Walz, A. Current role of social benefits in ecosystem service assessments. Landsc. Urban Plann. 149, 49–64 (2016).
Google Scholar
Richter, M., Heinemann, K., Meiser, N. & Dickhaut, W. Trees in sponge cities—A systematic review of trees as a component of blue-green infrastructure, vegetation engineering principles, and stormwater management. Water 16, 655 (2024).
Tülek, B., Sarı, D. & Körmeçli, P. Ş. Ecosystem services provided by urban Woody plants in the context of Spatial relations: Çankırı case area. Dendrobiology 91, 100–112 (2024).
Nyelele, C., Kroll, C. N. & Nowak, D. J. Present and future ecosystem services of trees in the Bronx, NY. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 42, 10–20 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gómez-Baggethun, E. & Barton, D. N. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol. Econ. 86, 235–245 (2013).
Creutzig, F. et al. Digitalization and the anthropocene. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 47, 479–509 (2022).
Google Scholar
Márton, A. Steps toward a digital ecology: ecological principles for the study of digital ecosystems. J. Inform. Technol. 37, 250–265 (2022).
Google Scholar
Verily et al. The promise of digital health: then, now, and the future. NAM Perspect. 6, (2022).
Baimukhanbetova, E., Onaltayev, D., Daumova, G., Amralinova, B. & Amangeldiyev, A. Improvement of informational technologies in ecology. E3S Web Conf. 159, 01008 (2020).
Bingham, G. et al. Issues in ecosystem valuation: improving information for decision making. Ecol. Econ. 14, 73–90 (1995).
Google Scholar
Wang, P. Connecting the parts with the whole: toward an information ecology theory of digital innovation ecosystems. MISQ 45, 397–422 (2021).
Google Scholar
Albert, C., Hauck, J., Buhr, N. & Von Haaren, C. What ecosystem services information do users want? Investigating interests and requirements among landscape and regional planners in Germany. Landsc. Ecol. 29, 1301–1313 (2014).
Song, Y., Chen, B. & Kwan, M. P. How does urban expansion impact people’s exposure to green environments? A comparative study of 290 Chinese cities. J. Clean. Prod. 246, 119018 (2020).
Yang, X. & Khan, I. Dynamics among economic growth, urbanization, and environmental sustainability in IEA countries: the role of industry value-added. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res. 29, 4116–4127 (2022).
Google Scholar
Reichman, O. J., Jones, M. B. & Schildhauer, M. P. Challenges and opportunities of open data in ecology. Science 331, 703–705 (2011).
Google Scholar
Balmford, A., Crane, P., Dobson, A., Green, R. E. & Mace, G. M. The 2010 challenge: data availability, information needs and extraterrestrial insights. Phil Trans. R Soc. B 360, 221–228 (2005).
Google Scholar
Michener, W. K. & Jones, M. B. Ecoinformatics: supporting ecology as a data-intensive science. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 85–93 (2012).
Google Scholar
Zięba-Kulawik, K. et al. Improving methods to calculate the loss of ecosystem services provided by urban trees using lidar and aerial orthophotos. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 63, 127195 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wallace, L. et al. Linking urban tree inventories to remote sensing data for individual tree mapping. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 61, 127106 (2021).
Zhao, B. Application of GIS, GPS, remote sensing technologies and virtual reality in environmental planning. Electron. Sci. Technol. Appl. 7, 96 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bidolakh, D., Lakyda, P., Myroniuk, V., Hayda, Y. & Pidkhovna, S. Assessment and representation of urban trees ecosystem services: a case study in pryzamkovyi park. Folia Forest. Pol. 65, 104–116 (2023).
Krzyżaniak, M., Świerk, D., Walerzak, M. & Urbański, P. The impact of urban conditions on different tree species in public green areas in the city of Poznan. Folia Horticult. 27, 89–97 (2015).
Szkop, Z. Evaluating the sensitivity of the i-Tree eco pollution model to different pollution data inputs: A case study from Warsaw, Poland. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 55, 126859 (2020).
Jedraszko-Macukow, M., Sitarski, M., Szczepanowska, H. B., Sudra, P. & Carewicz, N. Usługi Ekosystemowe Drzew i Krzewów W Parku Praskim Określone Za Pomocą modelu I-tree eco. Człowiek I Środowisko 41, 5–23 (2018).
Szkop, Z. An evaluation of the ecosystem services provided by urban trees: the role of Krasiński gardens in air quality and human health in Warsaw (Poland). Environ. Socio-econ. Stud. 4, 41–50 (2016).
Moody, R., Geron, N., Healy, M., Rogan, J. & Martin, D. Modeling the Spatial distribution of the current and future ecosystem services of urban tree planting in Chicopee and fall river, Massachusetts. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 66, 127403 (2021).
Morani, A., Nowak, D. J., Hirabayashi, S. & Calfapietra, C. How to select the best tree planting locations to enhance air pollution removal in the MillionTreesNYC initiative. Environ. Pollut. 159, 1040–1047 (2011).
Google Scholar
Ratnayake, C. & Emmanuel, R. Street tree designs for particulate matter reduction in Glasgow: A supportive approach for urban planning. (2024).
Google Scholar
Hintural, W. P. et al. Ecosystem services synergies and trade-offs from tree structural perspectives: implications for effective urban green space management and strategic land use planning. Sustainability 16, 7684 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sun, L. et al. Study on temperature regulation function of green spaces at community scale in high-density urban areas and planning design strategies. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 101, 128511 (2024).
Raum, S. et al. Achieving impact from ecosystem assessment and valuation of urban greenspace: the case of i-tree eco in great Britain. Landsc. Urban Plann. 190, 103590 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ghafari, S., Kaviani, B., Sedaghathoor, S. & Allahyari, M. S. Ecological potentials of trees, shrubs and hedge species for urban green spaces by multi criteria decision making. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 55, 126824 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sharmin, M. et al. Urban greening with shrubs can supercharge invertebrate abundance and diversity. Sci. Rep. 14, 8735 (2024).
Google Scholar
Muvengwi, J., Ndagurwa, H. G. T., Witkowski, E. T. F. & Mbiba, M. Woody species composition, diversity, and ecosystem services of yards along an urban socioeconomic gradient. Sci. Total Environ. 912, 168976 (2024).
Google Scholar
Aronson, M. F. et al. Biodiversity in the City: key challenges for urban green space management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 189–196 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ustawa o ochronie przyrody. 159 (2024).
i-Tree Eco Users Manual (version 6.0). (2021).
Rutkowski, L. Klucz Do Oznaczania Roślin Naczyniowych Polski Niżowej (Wadawnicto Naukowe PWS, 2015).
Bidolah, D. I. Geoinformation monitoring of green stands using remote sensing methods. Ukr. J. Wood Sci. 11, 4–14 (2020).
Suchocka, M. et al. Comparison of ecosystem services and replacement value calculations performed for urban trees. Ecosyst. Serv. 63, 101553 (2023).
Google Scholar
Nowak, D. J. Assessing the benefits and economic values of trees. in Routledge Handbook of Urban Forestry 152–163 (Routledge, 2017).
Google Scholar
Lin, J., Kroll, C. & Nowak, D. Ecosystem service-based sensitivity analyses of i-tree eco. AUF 46, 287–306 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mosyaftiani, A. et al. Monitoring and analyzing tree diversity using i-tree eco to strengthen urban forest management. Biodiversitas 23, (2022).
Eldridge, D. J. & Soliveres, S. Are shrubs really a sign of declining ecosystem function? Disentangling the Myths and truths of Woody encroachment in Australia. Aust J. Bot. 62, 594 (2014).
Xue, Y. et al. The effects of environment and species diversity on shrub survival in subtropical forests. Biodivers. Sci. 31, 22443 (2023).
Das Gupta, S. & Pinno, B. D. Drivers of understory species richness in reconstructed boreal ecosystems: a structural equation modeling analysis. Sci. Rep. 10, 11555 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wessels, N., Sitas, N., O’Farrell, P. & Esler, K. J. Inclusion of ecosystem services in the management of municipal natural open space systems. People Nat. 6, 301–320 (2024).
Lindenmayer, D. B. & Laurance, W. F. The ecology, distribution, conservation and management of large old trees. Biol. Rev. 92, 1434–1458 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gupta, A. & De, B. Enhancing the city-level thermal environment through the strategic utilization of urban green spaces employing geospatial techniques. Int. J. Biometeorol. 68, 2083–2101 (2024).
Google Scholar
Riondato, E., Pilla, F., Sarkar Basu, A. & Basu, B. Investigating the effect of trees on urban quality in Dublin by combining air monitoring with i-tree eco model. Sustain. Cities Soc. 61, 102356 (2020).
Google Scholar
Vashist, M., Kumar, T. V. & Singh, S. K. Assessment of air quality benefits of vegetation in an urban-industrial region of India by integrating air monitoring with i‐Tree eco model. Clean. Soil. Air Water 52, 2300198 (2024).
Google Scholar
Včeláková, R. et al. Assessment and spatial distribution of urban ecosystem functions applied in two Czech cities. Appl. Sci. 13, 5759 (2023).
Google Scholar
Prigioniero, A. et al. Holistic tool for ecosystem services and Disservices assessment in the urban forests of the real Bosco Di Capodimonte, Naples. Sci. Rep. 12, 16413 (2022).
Google Scholar
Nedkov, S. et al. Mapping and assessment of urban ecosystem condition and services using integrated index of spatial structure. OE 2, e14499 (2017).
Cimburova, Z. & Barton, D. N. The potential of geospatial analysis and bayesian networks to enable i-tree eco assessment of existing tree inventories. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 55, 126801 (2020).
Google Scholar
Stoeckl, N., Dodd, A. & Kompas, T. The monetary value of 16 services protected by the Australian National biosecurity system: spatially explicit estimates and vulnerability to incursions. Ecosyst. Serv. 60, 101509 (2023).
Google Scholar
link
