Integrating the multiple perspectives of people and nature in place-based marine spatial planning

0
Integrating the multiple perspectives of people and nature in place-based marine spatial planning
  • Frazão Santos, C. et al. A sustainable ocean for all. NPJ Ocean Sustain 1, s44183-022–00004–4 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, B. S. et al. An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature 488, 615–620 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N. J. Marine social science for the peopled seas. Coast. Manag. 47, 244–252 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N. J. et al. Conservation social science: understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biol. Conserv. 205, 93–108 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine, R. E. What is ecosystem management? Conserv. Biol. 8, 27–38 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Slocombe, D. S. Implementing ecosystem-based management. BioScience 43, 612–622 (1993).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkema, K. K., Abramson, S. C. & Dewsbury, B. M. Marine ecosystem-based management: from characterization to implementation. Front. Ecol. Environ. 4, 525–532 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Douvere, F. The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management. Mar. Policy 32, 762–771 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, K., Lubchenco, J., Palumbi, S. & Rosenberg, A. Scientific Consensus Statement on Marine Ecosystem-Based Management (2005).

  • Odum, E. P. The strategy of ecosystem development: an understanding of ecological succession provides a basis for resolving man’s conflict with nature. Science 164, 262–270 (1969).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, L. B. et al. Resolving mismatches in U.S. Ocean Governance. Science 313, 617–618 (2006).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, L. & Norse, E. Essential ecological insights for marine ecosystem-based management and marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 32, 772–778 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, S. M., Gjerde, K. M., Conners, M. G. & Crowder, L. B. Mobile protected areas for biodiversity on the high seas. Science 367, 252–254 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, S. M. et al. Dynamic ocean management: defining and conceptualizing real-time management of the ocean. Mar. Policy 58, 42–50 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazão Santos, C. et al. Key components of sustainable climate-smart ocean planning. NPJ Ocean Sustain 3, 10 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, J. M. et al. The Marine Spatial Planning Index: a tool to guide and assess marine spatial planning. NPJ Ocean Sustain 2, 15 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, J. M., Devillers, R. & Claudet, J. Benefits and gaps in area-based management tools for the ocean Sustainable Development Goal. Nat. Sustain 4, 349–357 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazão Santos, C. et al. in World Seas: An Environmental Evaluation 571–592 (Elsevier, 2019).

  • Manea, E., Agardy, T. & Bongiorni, L. Link marine restoration to marine spatial planning through ecosystem‐based management to maximize ocean regeneration. Aquat. Conserv. 33, 1387–1399 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO-IOC/European Commission. MSPglobal International Guide on Marine/Maritime Spatial Planning (2021).

  • St. Martin, K., McCay, B. J., Murray, G. D., Johnson, T. R. & Oles, B. Communities, knowledge and fisheries of the future. IJGENVI 7, 221 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, E., Acott, T. & Stojanovic, T. in Maritime Spatial Planning (eds. Zaucha, J. & Gee, K.) 151–174 (Springer International Publishing, 2019).

  • Boucquey, N., St. Fairbanks, L., Martin, K., Campbell, L. M. & McCay, B. The ontological politics of marine spatial planning: assembling the ocean and shaping the capacities of ‘Community’ and ‘Environment’. Geoforum 75, 1–11 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Martin, K. & Hall-Arber, M. The missing layer: geo-technologies, communities, and implications for marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 32, 779–786 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Martin, K. & Hall-Arber, M. Creating a place for ‘Community’ in New England fisheries. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 15, 161–170 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehler, C. & Douvere, F. Marine Spatial Planning: A Step-by-Step Approach toward Ecosystem-Based Management. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Programme. (2009).

  • Flannery, W. in Ocean Governance (eds. Partelow, S., Hadjimichael, M. & Hornidge, A.-K.) Vol. 25, 93–111 (Springer International Publishing, 2023).

  • Gee, K. & Siedschlag, D. A place-based perspective on marine and coastal space. Eur. XXI 36, 59–74 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, K. E. Waves of Knowing: A Seascape Epistemology (Duke University Press, 2016).

  • Said, A. & Trouillet, B. Bringing ‘deep knowledge’ of fisheries into marine spatial planning. Marit. Stud. 19, 347–357 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, K. et al. Identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning. Ocean Coast. Manag. 136, 139–147 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittinger, J. N. et al. A practical approach for putting people in ecosystem-based ocean planning. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12, 448–456 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Cornu, E., Kittinger, J. N., Koehn, J. Z., Finkbeiner, E. M. & Crowder, L. B. Current practice and future prospects for social data in coastal and ocean planning: social data in coastal and ocean planning. Conserv. Biol. 28, 902–911 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazão Santos, C. et al. Ocean planning in a changing climate. Nat. Geosci. 9, 730–730 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. 2nd International Conference on Marine/Maritime Spatial Planning, 15–17 March 2017. in Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission [6435], Directorate General for Fisheries and Maritime Affairs Vol. IOC/2017/WR/279 48 (Paris, France, 2017).

  • Tuan, Y.-F. in Philosophy in Geography (eds. Gale, S. & Olsson, G.) 387–427 (Springer Netherlands, 1979).

  • Wilson, M. W. in Key Methods in Geography (eds. Clifford, N. J., Cope, M. & Gillespie, T.) (SAGE, 2023).

  • Sheppard, E. Knowledge production through critical GIS: genealogy and prospects. Cartographica 40, 5–21 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Martin, K. & Wing, J. The discourse and discipline of GIS. Cartographica 42, 235–248 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Martin, K. & Olson, J. in Conservation for the Anthropocene Ocean 123–141 (Elsevier, 2017).

  • Steinberg, P. & Peters, K. Wet Ontologies, fluid spaces: giving depth to volume through oceanic thinking. Environ. Plan D. 33, 247–264 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, K. in Transdisciplinary Marine Research 46–62 (Routledge, 2023).

  • Daigle, M. Awawanenitakik The spatial politics of recognition and relational geographies of Indigenous self-determination. Can. Geogr. Géogr. Can. 60, 259–269 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, A. J. & Pickerill, J. Doings with the land and sea: decolonising geographies, Indigeneity, and enacting place-agency. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 44, 640–662 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. T. et al. Weaving Indigenous and sustainability sciences to diversify our methods. Sustain. Sci. 11, 1–11 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brattland, C. & Nilsen, S. Reclaiming indigenous seascapes. Sami place names in Norwegian sea charts. Polar Geogr. 34, 275–297 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Boroditsky, L. How language shapes thought. Sci. Am. 304, 62–65 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, V. A. et al. The contribution of sense of place to social-ecological systems research: a review and research agenda. Ecol. Soc. 22, (2017).

  • Berkes, F., Folke, C. & Colding, J. Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience (Cambridge University Press, 2000).

  • Aswani, S. et al. Marine resource management and conservation in the Anthropocene. Envir. Conserv. 45, 192–202 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagoe, A. A., Aheto, D. W., Okyere, I., Adade, R. & Odoi, J. Community participation in assessment of fisheries related ecosystem services towards the establishment of marine protected area in the Greater Cape Three Points area in Ghana. Mar. Policy 124, 104336 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabinyi, M., Evans, L. & Foale, S. J. Social-ecological systems, social diversity, and power: insights from anthropology and political ecology. Ecol. Soc. 19, (2014).

  • Jones, N. A., Shaw, S., Ross, H., Witt, K. & Pinner, B. The study of human values in understanding and managing social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 21, (2016).

  • Faulkner, L., Brown, K. & Quinn, T. Analyzing community resilience as an emergent property of dynamic social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 23, art24 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlüter, M. et al. Capturing emergent phenomena in social-ecological systems: an analytical framework. Ecol. Soc. 24, art11 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, L., Vafeidis, A. T. & Honsel, L. E. Population development as a driver of coastal risk: current trends and future pathways. Camb. Prisms Coast. Futures 1, e14 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. J. et al. Coral reef ecology in the Anthropocene. Funct. Ecol. 33, 1014–1022 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, A. T. et al. Principles for transformative ocean governance. Nat. Sustain 6, 1587–1599 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Biedenweg, K., Stiles, K. & Wellman, K. A holistic framework for identifying human wellbeing indicators for marine policy. Mar. Policy 64, 31–37 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Anbleyth-Evans, J. in Human-Nature Interactions (eds. Misiune, I., Depellegrin, D. & Egarter Vigl, L.) 315–327 (Springer International Publishing, 2022).

  • Pittman, S. et al. Seascape ecology: identifying research priorities for an emerging ocean sustainability science. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 663, 1–29 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Auster, P. J. et al. Developing an ocean ethic: science, utility, aesthetics, self-interest, and different ways of knowing. Conserv. Biol. 23, 233–235 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, G. B., Kenter, J. O., O’Connor, S., Daunt, F. & Young, J. C. A fulfilled human life: eliciting sense of place and cultural identity in two UK marine environments through the Community Voice Method. Ecosyst. Serv. 39, 100992 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardoin, N. M. Exploring sense of place and environmental behavior at an ecoregional scale in three sites. Hum. Ecol. 42, 425–441 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W. & Wheaton, M. Leveraging collective action and environmental literacy to address complex sustainability challenges. Ambio 52, 30–44 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, R. et al. Connecting to the oceans: supporting ocean literacy and public engagement. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 32, 123–143 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, E. M. et al. Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14, 76–85 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gascon, M., Zijlema, W., Vert, C., White, M. P. & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. Outdoor blue spaces, human health and well-being: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 220, 1207–1221 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpela, K. M. et al. Environmental strategies of affect regulation and their associations with subjective well-being. Front. Psychol. 9, 562 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, R., Wheeler, B. W., Higgins, S. L., Irvine, K. N. & Depledge, M. H. A systematic review of the health and well-being benefits of biodiverse environments. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part B 17, 1–20 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. P., Elliott, L. R., Gascon, M., Roberts, B. & Fleming, L. E. Blue space, health and well-being: a narrative overview and synthesis of potential benefits. Environ. Res. 191, 110169 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainisio, N. & Inghilleri, P. in Well-Being and Cultures (eds. Knoop, H. H. & Delle Fave, A.) Vol. 3, 103–116 (Springer Netherlands, 2013).

  • Marsell, M. R., Stadler, J., Korn, H., Irvine, K. N. & Bonn, A. (eds.) Biodiversity and Health in the Face of Climate Change (Springer, 2019).

  • Ainsworth, C. H., Pitcher, T. J. & Rotinsulu, C. Evidence of fishery depletions and shifting cognitive baselines in Eastern Indonesia. Biol. Conserv. 141, 848–859 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. M. A. et al. Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 1462–1465 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Quijano, C. G., Poggie, J. J., Pitchon, A. & Del Pozo, M. H. Coastal resource foraging, life satisfaction, and well-being in Southeastern Puerto Rico. J. Anthropol. Res. 71, 145–167 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gesler, W. M. Therapeutic landscapes: medical issues in light of the new cultural geography. Soc. Sci. Med. 34, 735–746 (1992).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stori, F. T., Peres, C. M., Turra, A. & Pressey, R. L. Traditional ecological knowledge supports ecosystem-based management in disturbed coastal marine social-ecological systems. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 571 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Colorado, P. Indigenous science. ReVision 18, 6–10 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Varghese, J. & Crawford, S. S. A cultural framework for Indigenous, Local, and Science knowledge systems in ecology and natural resource management. Ecol. Monogr. 91, e01431 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. R. et al. Epistemological pluralism: reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecol. Soc. 13, (2008).

  • Berkström, C., Papadopoulos, M., Jiddawi, N. S. & Nordlund, L. M. Fishers’ local ecological knowledge (LEK) on connectivity and seascape management. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 130 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, P. & White, A. T. Trends in development of coastal area management in tropical countries: from central to community orientation. Coast. Manag. 25, 155–181 (1997).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannes, R. E. & Neis, B. The value of anecdote. Fishers’ knowledge in fisheries science and management. Coast. Manag. Sourceb. 4, 41–58 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. in Lore: Capturing Traditional Environmental Knowledge (IDRC, 1992).

  • Wolfe, J. Indigenous and Western Knowledge and Resources Management System (University School of Rural Planning and Development …, 1992).

  • Bender, M., Bustamante, R. & Leonard, K. Living in relationship with the Ocean to transform governance in the UN Ocean Decade. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001828 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadow, N., Dorrian-Bak, H.-B. & Maloney, E. Leveraging Earth law principles to protect ocean rights. Env’t L. Rep. 53, 10838 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, A. J. et al. “Two-Eyed Seeing”: an Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management. Fish Fish 22, 243–261 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A. L., Gabel, C., Ballantyne, M., Jack, S. M. & Wahoush, O. Using two-eyed seeing in research with indigenous people: an integrative review. Int. J. Qual. Methods 18, 1609406919869695 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C., Marshall, M. & Marshall, A. Two-Eyed Seeing and other lessons learned within a co-learning journey of bringing together indigenous and mainstream knowledges and ways of knowing. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 2, 331–340 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Peart, R. A ‘sea change’ in marine planning: the development of New Zealand’s first marine spatial plan. Policy Quart. 13, (2017).

  • Dawson, J. et al. Infusing Inuit and local knowledge into the Low Impact Shipping Corridors: an adaptation to increased shipping activity and climate change in Arctic Canada. Environ. Sci. Policy 105, 19–36 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, G. et al. Marine Plan Partnership for the North Pacific Coast: engagement and communication with stakeholders and the public. Mar. Policy 142, 104613 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.-E. Land use management and cultural value of ecosystem services in Southwestern Korean islands. J. Mar. Isl. Cult. 2, 49–55 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Khakzad, S. & Griffith, D. The role of fishing material culture in communities’ sense of place as an added-value in management of coastal areas. J. Mar. Isl. Cult. 5, 95–117 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Whaanga, H., Wehi, P., Cox, M., Roa, T. & Kusabs, I. Māori oral traditions record and convey indigenous knowledge of marine and freshwater resources. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 52, 487–496 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldow, C. et al. Biogeographic assessments: a framework for information synthesis in marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 51, 423–432 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubalo, M., van Zanten, B. T. & Verburg, P. H. Crowdsourcing geo-information on landscape perceptions and preferences: a review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 184, 101–111 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully-Engelmeyer, K. M., Granek, E. F., Nielsen-Pincus, M. & Brown, G. Participatory GIS mapping highlights indirect use and existence values of coastal resources and marine conservation areas. Ecosyst. Serv. 50, 101301 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonge, J., Moore, S. A., Ryan, M. M. & Beckley, L. E. A photo-elicitation approach to exploring the place meanings ascribed by campers to the Ningaloo coastline, North-western Australia. Aust. Geographer 44, 143–160 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, L., Evanovitch, J. & Muliaina, T. Envisioning indigenized geography: a two-eyed seeing approach. J. Geogr. High. Educ. 45, 201–220 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwaymullina, A. Research, Ethics and Indigenous Peoples: an Australian Indigenous perspective on three threshold considerations for respectful engagement. AlterNative: Int. J. Indigenous Peoples 12, 437–449 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. M. & Davidson-Hunt, I. Agency and resilience: teachings of Pikangikum First Nation elders, Northwestern Ontario. Ecol. Soc. 18, art9 (2013).

  • Kimmerer, R. W. & Artelle, K. A. Time to support Indigenous science. Science 383, 243–243 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Proulx, M., Ross, L., Macdonald, C., Fitzsimmons, S. & Smit, M. Indigenous traditional ecological knowledge and ocean observing: a review of successful partnerships. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 703938 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, A. J. et al. Ecological research ‘in a good way’ means ethical and equitable relationships with Indigenous Peoples and Lands. Nat. Ecol. Evol. (2024).

  • Jennings, L. et al. Applying the ‘CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance’ to ecology and biodiversity research. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1547–1551 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ban, N. C. et al. Incorporate Indigenous perspectives for impactful research and effective management. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1680–1683 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nenadovic, M., Johnson, T. & Wilson, J. Implementing the western Gulf of Maine Area Closure: the role and perception of fishers’ ecological knowledge. Ecol. Soc. 17, art20 (2012).

  • Ruddle, K. in Property Rights in A Social and Ecological Context: Case Studies and Design Applications (eds. Han, S. & Musinghe, M.) (The World Bank, 1995).

  • Shephard, S., Connolly, P., Hareide, N.-R. & Rogan, E. Establishing stakeholder connections for management of the Irish orange roughy fishery. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 64, 841–845 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavinck, M. & Verrips, J. Manifesto for the marine social sciences. Marit. Stud. 19, 121–123 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, S. & Köpsel, V. Transdisciplinary Marine Research: Bridging Science and Society (Taylor & Francis, 2023).

  • Koehn, J. Z., Reineman, D. R. & Kittinger, J. N. Progress and promise in spatial human dimensions research for ecosystem-based ocean planning. Mar. Policy 42, 31–38 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, M. M., Harasti, D., Pittock, J. & Doran, B. Linking the social to the ecological using GIS methods in marine spatial planning and management to support resilience: a review. Mar. Policy 108, 103657 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanborn, T. & Jung, J. Intersecting social science and conservation. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 676394 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, E. et al. Development and expansion in the marine social sciences: Insights from the global community. iScience 25, 104735 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, L. et al. Integrating maritime cultural heritage into maritime spatial planning in Estonia. Mar. Policy 147, 105337 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland-Munro, J., Kobryn, H., Brown, G. & Moore, S. A. Marine spatial planning for the future: using Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) to inform the human dimension for large marine parks. Mar. Policy 73, 15–26 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, A. in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science (Oxford University Press, 2017).

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness (Harvard University Press, 1983).

  • Kearney, A. R. & Kaplan, S. Toward a methodology for the measurement of knowledge structures of ordinary people: the conceptual content cognitive map (3CM). Environ. Behav. 29, 579–617 (1997).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N. A., Ross, H., Lynam, T., Perez, P. & Leitch, A. Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecol. Soc. 16, (2011).

  • Puniwai, N., Gray, S., Lepczyk, C., Kapono, T. M. K. A. & Severance, C. Mapping ocean currents through human observations: insights from Hilo Bay, Hawai’i. Hum. Ecol. 44, 365–374 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, J., Mushynsky, J. & Cabrera, G. A fluid sea in the Mariana Islands: community archaeology and mapping the seascape of Saipan. J. Marit. Archaeol. 9, 59–79 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. Mind maps of the Maori. GeoJournal 77, 741–751 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, R. et al. ‘Drawing the coral heads’: mental mapping and its physical representation in a Polynesian community. Cartogr. J. 40, 243–253 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Slocum, T. A., McMaster, R. B., Kessler, F. C., & Howard, H. H. (2022). Thematic cartography andgeovisualization. CRC Press.

  • Monnet, J. La symbolique des lieux: pour une géographie des relations entre espace, pouvoir et identité. cybergeo (1998).

  • Pavlovskaya, M. Critical GIS as a tool for social transformation. Can. Geogr. Géogr. Can. 62, 40–54 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlovskaya, M. & St. Martin, K. Feminism and geographic information systems: from a missing object to a mapping subject: feminism and geographic information systems. Geogr. Compass 1, 583–606 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnad, D. Incorporating local ecological knowledge aids participatory mapping for marine conservation and customary fishing management. Mar. Policy 135, 104841 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S., Bampton, M., Cornick, L. & Patolo, N. Mapping the anthropogenic ocean: a critical GIS approach. Geogr. Rev. 113, 554–572 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateos-Molina, D. et al. An integrative and participatory coastal habitat mapping framework for sustainable development actions in the United Arab Emirates. Appl. Geogr. 136, 102568 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Monmonier, M. How to Lie with Maps (University of Chicago Press, 1991).

  • Shucksmith, R. J. & Kelly, C. Data collection and mapping—principles, processes and application in marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 50, 27–33 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanahele, P. K. Ka Honua Ola/The Living Earth: `Eli`eli Kau Mai/Descend, Deepen the Revelation (Kamehameha Schools Pr, 2011).

  • Kikiloi, K. & Graves, M. Rebirth of an archipelago: sustaining a Hawaiian cultural identity for people andhomeland. Hulili: Multidiscip. Res. Hawaiian Well-Being 6, 73–114 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, K.-A. R. K. N. Ancestral Places: Understanding Kanaka Geographies (Oregon State University Press, 2014).

  • Kahāʻulelio, D. Ka ʻOihana Lawaiʻa: Hawaiian Fishing Traditions (2006).

  • Malo, D. Hawaiian Antiquities (Moolelo Hawaii) (Hawaiian Gazette Company, Limited, 1903).

  • Jokiel, P., Rodgers, K., Walsh, W., Polhemus, D. & Wilhelm, T. Marine resource management in the Hawaiian Archipelago: the traditional Hawaiian system in relation to the Western approach. J. Mar. Biol. 2011, 151682 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, H., Watkin Lui, F., Sellwood, J., Barrett, M. J. & Chigeza, P. Sea Country: navigating Indigenous and colonial ontologies in Australian environmental education. Environ. Educ. Res. 20, 56–69 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A. & Shwom, R. Environmental values. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 30, 335–372 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, G., D’Anna, L. & MacDonald, P. Measuring what we value: the utility of mixed methods approaches for incorporating values into marine social-ecological system management. Mar. Policy 73, 61–68 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, R. & Douvere, F. The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Mar. Policy 32, 816–822 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, E., Acott, T. & Yates, K. L. Marine social sciences: looking towards a sustainable future. Environ. Sci. Policy 108, 85–92 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. Sacred Ecology (Routledge, 2017).

  • Innes, J. E. & Booher, D. E. Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Plan. Theory Pract. 5, 419–436 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ban, N. C. & Klein, C. J. Spatial socioeconomic data as a cost in systematic marine conservation planning. Conserv. Lett. 2, 206–215 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. & Flannery, W. The post-political nature of marine spatial planning and modalities for its re-politicisation. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 22, 170–183 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. & Oxarart, A. Intermediate collaborative adaptive management strategies build stakeholder capacity. Ecol. Soc. 18, (2013).

  • Loch, T. K. & Riechers, M. Integrating indigenous and local knowledge in management and research on coastal ecosystems in the Global South: a literature review. Ocean Coast. Manag. 212, 105821 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurstad, A. in Northern Ethnographic Landscapes. Perspectives from Circumpolar Nations (eds. Krupnik, I., Mason, R. & Horton, T. H.) 277–297 (Smithsonian Institution, 2004).

  • Williams, D. R. Making sense of ‘place’: Reflections on pluralism and positionality in place research. Landscape and urban planning, 131, 74–82 (2014).

  • Bennett, N. J. et al. Environmental (in)justice in the Anthropocene ocean. Mar. Policy 147, 105383 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wester, J., Broad, K., Backe, K. H., Callwood, K., Fielding, R., Jacquet, J., Macdonald, C. and Moore, A. Culture and historic value as ways of understanding complex human health-ocean linkages. In Oceans and Human Health, 39–70 (Academic Press, 2023).

  • Fleming, L. E., Maycock, B., White, M. P. & Depledge, M. H. Fostering human health through ocean sustainability in the 21st century. People Nat. 1, 276–283 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheetz, S. D., Tegarden, D. P., Kozar, K. A. & Zigurs, I. A group support systems approach to cognitive mapping. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 11, 31–57 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, E. & Biedenweg, K. Exploring the diversity of mental models associated with Belize’s Managed Access Fisheries Policy. Ocean Coast. Manag. 178, 104868 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, P. Method Meets Art: Arts-Based Research Practice (Guilford Publications, 2020).

  • McNamara, K. E. & McNamara, J. P. Using participatory action research to share knowledge of the local environment and climate change: case study of Erub Island. Torres Strait. AJIE 40, 30–39 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear-Ka’ōpua, N. in Kanaka ‘Ōiwi Methodologies (eds. Oliveira, K.-A. R. K. N. & Wright, E. K.) 1–29 (University of Hawaii Press, 2017).

  • Léopold, M., Herrenschmidt, J. B. & Thaman, R. R. The relevance of traditional ecological knowledge for modern management of coral reef fisheries in Melanesia. in Proceedings of the 11th International Coral Reef Symposium Vol. 2, 1014–1018 (National Coral Reef Institute, 2008).

  • Cogos, S., Roué, M. & Roturier, S. Sami place names and maps: transmitting knowledge of a cultural landscape in contemporary contexts. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 49, 43–51 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brattland, C. Towards a Coastal Sámi Atlas. ArcGIS StoryMaps (2021).

  • Katona, S. et al. Navigating the Seascape of Ocean Management: Waypoints on the Voyage toward Sustainable Use. (2017).

  • Moore, S. A., Brown, G., Kobryn, H. & Strickland-Munro, J. Identifying conflict potential in a coastal and marine environment using participatory mapping. J. Environ. Manag. 197, 706–718 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz, N. & Holmén, J. Introduction to the theme issue: “Mental maps: geographical and historical perspectives”. J. Cult. Geogr. 35, 157–161 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, J. S. Meadows, Memories, and Missing Layers: Transdisciplinary Mapping of Sanday’s Seagrass Towards Restorative Marine Spatial Planning (The University of Oxford, 2023).

  • Furman, K. L., Aminpour, P., Gray, S. A. & Scyphers, S. B. Mental models for assessing coastal social-ecological systems following disasters. Mar. Policy 125, 104334 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrain, C. Territorialisation des espaces océaniques hauturiers. L’apport de la navigation à voile dans l’Océan Atlantique. (Université de La Rochelle, 2010).

  • Parrain, C. in Géographie des mers et des océans: capes-agrégation histoire-géographie (ed. Escach, N.) (Dunod, 2015).

  • Strand, M., Rivers, N. & Snow, B. Reimagining ocean stewardship: arts-based methods to ‘hear’ and ‘see’ indigenous and local knowledge in ocean management. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, 886632 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, D. A. The World and All the Things upon It: Native Hawaiian Geographies of Exploration (U of Minnesota Press, 2016).

  • Dixon, D. P. & Jones, J. P. My dinner with Derrida, or spatial analysis and poststructuralism do lunch. Environ. Plan A 30, 247–260 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, M., McClintock, W., Burt, C. & Welch, T. SeaSketch. in Evaluating Participatory Mapping Software (ed. Burnett, C. M.) 121–147 (Springer International Publishing, 2023).

  • Goldberg, E. G. & McClintock, W. J. Integrated participation tools facilitate science-based spatial planning with a web-based GIS. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposoim for GIS and Computer Cartography for Coastal Zone Managemnet 154–157 (2016).

  • Seijo, C., Calado, H., McClintock, W., Gil, A. & Fonseca, C. Mapping recreational ecosystem services from stakeholders’ perspective in the Azores. One Ecosyst. 6, e65751 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. Participatory mapping and geographic information systems: whose map? Who is empowered and who disempowered? Who gains and who loses? Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries 25, 1–11 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, W., Healy, N. & Luna, M. Exclusion and non-participation in Marine Spatial Planning. Mar. Policy 88, 32–40 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *