Scenario planning from the bottom up: supporting inclusive and ecosystem-based approaches to marine spatial planning

Stuchtey, M. R., Vincent, A., Merkl, A. & Bucher, M. Ocean Solutions That Benefit People, Nature and the Economy (High Level Panel for A Sustainable Ocean Economy, 2020).

Worm, B. et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314, 787–790 (2006).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

McCauley, D. J. et al. Marine defaunation: animal loss in the global ocean. Science 347, 1255641 (2015).

Halpern, B. S. et al. Recent pace of change in human impact on the world’s ocean. Sci. Rep. 9, 11609 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Rogers, A. D. et al. In The Blue Compendium. 333–392 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2023).

Frazão Santos, C. et al. In World Seas: An Environmental Evaluation (ed. Sheppard, C.) 571–592 (Academic Press, 2019).

Chalastani, V. I., Tsoukala, V. K., Coccossis, H. & Duarte, C. M. A bibliometric assessment of progress in marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 127, 104329 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Ehler, C. N. Two decades of progress in marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 132, 104134 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Rafael, T., Cabral, H., Mourato, J. & Ferrão, J. Marine spatial planning: a systematic literature review on its concepts, approaches, and tools (2004–2020). Marit. Stud. 23, 6 (2024).

Google Scholar 

UNESCO-IOC/European Commission. MSPglobal International Guide on Marine/Maritime Spatial Planning. Maritime Spatial Planning. IOC Manuals and Guides no. 89 (UNESCO-IOC/European Commission, 2021)

Voyer, M., Quirk, G., McIlgorm, A. & Azmi, K. Shades of blue: what do competing interpretations of the Blue Economy mean for oceans governance?. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 20, 595–616 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Germond-Duret, C., Heidkamp, C. P. & Morrissey, J. Injustice and the blue economy. Geogr. J. 189, 184–192 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Strand, M., Rivers, N. & Snow, B. Reimagining ocean stewardship: arts-based methods to ‘Hear’ and ‘See’ indigenous and local knowledge in ocean management. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, 886632 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Rivers, N. et al. Pathways to integrate Indigenous and local knowledge in ocean governance processes: lessons from the Algoa Bay Project. South Afr. Front Mar. Sci. 9, 1084674 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Kaikkonen, L. et al. Fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion in interdisciplinary marine science. npj Ocean. Sustainability 3, 49 (2024).

Google Scholar 

Papageorgiou, M., Pozoukidou, G., Istoriou, T. & Kostopoulou, T. Inclusive maritime spatial planning: stakes at the regional level. Sustainability 16, 10148 (2024).

Google Scholar 

Gaymer, C. F. et al. Merging top-down and bottom-up approaches in marine protected areas planning: experiences from around the globe. Aquat. Conserv. 24, 128–144 (2014).

Google Scholar 

Govan, H. et al. Status and Potential of Locally-Managed Marine Areas in the South Pacific: Meeting Nature Conservation and Sustainable Livelihood Targets through Wide-Spread Implementation of LMMAs. 95 pp + 5 annexes (SPREP/WWF/WorldFish-Reefbase/CRISP, 2009).

Rakotomahazo, C. et al. Participatory planning of a community-based payments for ecosystem services initiative in Madagascar’s mangroves. Ocean Coast Manag. 175, 43–52 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Portman, M. E. Marine spatial planning: achieving and evaluating integration. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 68, 2191–2200 (2011).

Google Scholar 

Flannery, W., Clarke, J. & McAteer, B. In Maritime Spatial Planning. 201–217 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019).

McKinley, E., Acott, T. & Stojanovic, T. In Maritime Spatial Planning. 151–174 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019).

Trouillet, B. Reinventing marine spatial planning: a critical review of initiatives worldwide. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 22, 441–459 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Morf, A., Kull, M., Piwowarczyk, J. & Gee, K. In Maritime Spatial Planning. 219–243 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019).

Kidd, S., Jones, H. & Jay, S. In Maritime Spatial Planning. 245–270 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019).

Morrissey, J. Coastal communities, blue economy and the climate crisis: framing just disruptions. Geogr. J. 189, 283–299 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Tafon, R. et al. Mainstreaming coastally just and equitable marine spatial planning: Planner and stakeholder experiences and perspectives on participation in Latvia. Ocean Coast Manag. 242, 106681 (2023).

Jones, P. J. S., Lieberknecht, L. M. & Qiu, W. Marine spatial planning in reality: Introduction to case studies and discussion of findings. Mar. Policy 71, 256–264 (2016).

Google Scholar 

Republic of South Africa. Operation Phakisa. Oceans Economy: Summary Progress Report. (Republic of South Africa, 2019).

Findlay, K. Operation Phakisa and unlocking South Africa’s ocean economy. J. Indian Ocean Reg. 14, 248–254 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Satgar, V. In The Climate Crisis: South African and Global Democratic Eco-Socialist Alternatives (ed. Satgar, V.) 1–27 (Wits University Press, Johannesburg, 2018).

Sunde, J. A seismic shift: a coalition of fishing communities, activists and lawyers has come together to keep the coasts and oceans of South Africa free of the destructive Blue Economy agenda. Samudra 87, 4–7 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Sowman, M., Mbatha, P. & von Holdt, J. Strategies for addressing conflicts arising from blue growth initiatives: insights from three case studies in South Africa. Maritime Stud. 22, 51 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Sowman, M. & Sunde, J. Integrating environmental sustainability and social justice principles into South Africa’s blue economy initiative: re-imagining the political economy of our ocean. Front. Ocean Sustain. 2, 1459496 (2024).

Google Scholar 

Government of South Africa. Act No. 16 of 2018: Marine Spatial Planning Act. Government Gazette No: 42444: 647. (Government of South Africa, 2019).

Reed, J. & Lombard, A. The role of civil society in supporting marine spatial planning. Maritime Rev. Afr. 20–24 (2017).

Dorrington, R. A. et al. Working together for our oceans: a marine spatial plan for Algoa Bay, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 114, 3/4 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Holness, S. D. et al. Using systematic conservation planning to align priority areas for biodiversity and nature-based activities in marine spatial planning: A real-world application in contested marine space. Biol. Conserv. 271, 109574 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Reimer, J. M. et al. The marine spatial planning index: a tool to guide and assess marine spatial planning. Ocean Sustain. 2, 15 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Lombard, A. T. et al. Practical approaches and advances in spatial tools to achieve multi-objective marine spatial planning. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 166 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Pınarbaşı, K., Galparsoro, I. & Borja, Á End users’ perspective on decision support tools in marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 108, 103658 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Vermeulen-Miltz, E., Clifford-Holmes, J. K., Scharler, U. M. & Lombard, A. T. A system dynamics model to support marine spatial planning in Algoa Bay. South Afr. Environ. Model. Softw. 160, 105601 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Wedding, L. M. et al. Integrating the multiple perspectives of people and nature in place-based marine spatial planning. npj Ocean Sustain 3, 43 (2024).

Google Scholar 

Hanson, J. et al. prioritizr: Systematic Conservation Prioritization in R. R package version 8.0.3.5. (2024).

Margules, C. & Pressey, R. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405, 243–253 (2000).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Ball, I. R., Possingham, H. P. & Watts, M. E. In Spatial Conservation Prioritization. 185–195 (Oxford University PressOxford, 2009).

Flower, J. et al. Marine spatial planning on the Caribbean island of Montserrat: lessons for data-limited small islands. Conserv Sci. Pr. 2, e158 (2020).

Google Scholar 

André, L. V. et al. A framework for mapping local knowledge on ciguatera and artisanal fisheries to inform systematic conservation planning. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 78, 1357–1371 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Boussarie, G., Kopp, D., Lavialle, G., Mouchet, M. & Morfin, M. Marine spatial planning to solve increasing conflicts at sea: a framework for prioritizing offshore windfarms and marine protected areas. J. Environ. Manag. 339, 117857 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Lombard, A. T. et al. Conserving pattern and process in the Southern Ocean: designing a marine protected area for the Prince Edward Islands. Antarct. Sci. 19, 39–54 (2007).

Google Scholar 

Lagabrielle, E., Lombard, A. T., Harris, J. M. & Livingstone, T. C. Multi-scale multi-level marine spatial planning: a novel methodological approach applied in South Africa. PLoS ONE 13, e0192582 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Sink, K. J. et al. Integrated systematic planning and adaptive stakeholder process support a 10-fold increase in South Africa’s Marine Protected Area estate. Conserv. Lett. e12954 (2023).

Harris, L. R. et al. Practical marine spatial management of ecologically or biologically significant marine areas: emerging lessons from evidence-based planning and implementation in a developing-world context. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, 831678 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Faure-Beaulieu, N. et al. A systematic conservation plan identifying critical areas for improved chondrichthyan protection in South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 284, 110163 (2023).

Google Scholar 

DEA. National Framework on Marine Spatial Planning in South Africa. Government Gazette No. 40860 (Department of Environmental Affairs. Republic of South Africa, 2017).

DFFE. National Framework for Marine Spatial Planning in South Africa. (Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment. Republic of South Africa, 2021).

Agostini, V. N. et al. Marine zoning in St. Kitts and Nevis: a design for sustainable management in the Caribbean. Ocean Coast Manag. 104, 1–10 (2015).

Google Scholar 

Jumin, R. et al. From Marxan to management: ocean zoning with stakeholders for Tun Mustapha Park in Sabah. Malays. ORYX 52, 775–786 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Mazor, T., Possingham, H. P., Edelist, D., Brokovich, E. & Kark, S. The crowded sea: Incorporating multiple marine activities in conservation plans can significantly alter spatial priorities. PLoS ONE 9, e104489 (2014).

Google Scholar 

Stelzenmüller, V. et al. Evaluation of marine spatial planning requires fit for purpose monitoring strategies. J. Environ. Manag. 278, 111545 (2021).

Google Scholar 

García-Barón, I., Giakoumi, S., Santos, M. B., Granado, I. & Louzao, M. The value of time-series data for conservation planning. J. Appl. Ecol. 58, 608–619 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Issifu, I., Dahmouni, I., García-Lorenzo, I. & Sumaila, U. R. Economics in marine spatial planning: a review of issues in British Columbia and similar jurisdictions. Sustainability 16, 1210 (2024).

Google Scholar 

Arkema, K. K. et al. Embedding ecosystem services in coastal planning leads to better outcomes for people and nature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7390–7395 (2015).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Bassi, A. M., Gallagher, L. A. & Helsingen, H. Green economy modelling of ecosystem services along the “road to Dawei”. Environments 3, 19 (2016).

Google Scholar 

Domisch, S. et al. Social equity shapes zone-selection: balancing aquatic biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services delivery in the transboundary Danube River Basin. Sci. Total Environ. 656, 797–807 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Benez-Secanho, F. J., Dwivedi, P., Ferreira, S., Hepinstall-Cymerman, J. & Wenger, S. Trade-offs between the value of ecosystem services and connectivity among protected areas in the upper Chattahoochee watershed. Environ. Manag. 69, 937–951 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Markantonatou, V. et al. Marine spatial plans focusing on biodiversity conservation: the case of the Aegean Sea. Aquat. Conserv 31, 2278–2292 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Kockel, A., Ban, N. C., Costa, M. & Dearden, P. Addressing distribution equity in spatial conservation prioritization for small-scale fisheries. PLoS ONE 15, e0233339 (2020).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Brunel, A. et al. Opening the black box of decision support tools in marine spatial planning: shedding light into reserve site selection algorithms for a balanced empowerment of stakeholders. Available at SSRN: or (2021).

Brunel, A. & Bertrand, S. L. In Marine Spatial Planning in the Tropical Atlantic: fRom A Tower of Babel to Collective Intelligence (eds. Bonnin, M. & Bertrand, S.) 347–378 (2023).

DFFE. Science based measures are now being implemented to protect the critically endangered African penguins, says minister of forestry fisheries and environment, Ms Barbara Creecy. Media Release (DFFE, 2023).

Spijkers, J. et al. Exploring the future of fishery conflict through narrative scenarios. One Earth 4, 386–396 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Watts, M. E. et al. Marxan with zones: software for optimal conservation based land- and sea-use zoning. Environ. Model. Softw. 24, 1513–1521 (2009).

Google Scholar 

Day, J. C., Kenchington, R. A., Tanzer, J. M. & Cameron, D. S. Marine zoning revisited: How decades of zoning the Great Barrier Reef has evolved as an effective spatial planning approach for marine ecosystem-based management. Aquat. Conserv. 29, 9–32 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Smythe, T. C. & McCann, J. Achieving integration in marine governance through marine spatial planning: Findings from practice in the United States. Ocean Coast Manag. 167, 197–207 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Sustainable Grenadines Inc. Report of the “Developing a framework for a comprehensive marine multi-use zoning plan for the Grenadine Islands” Project, SusGren, Clifton, Union Island, St. Vincent and the Grenadines. (Sustainable Grenadines Inc, 2012).

Klein, C. J., Steinback, C., Watts, M., Scholz, A. J. & Possingham, H. P. Spatial marine zoning for fisheries and conservation. Front Ecol. Environ. 8, 349–353 (2010).

Google Scholar 

Grantham, H. S. et al. A comparison of zoning analyses to inform the planning of a marine protected area network in Raja Ampat, Indonesia. Mar. Policy 38, 184–194 (2013).

Google Scholar 

Yates, K. L., Schoeman, D. S. & Klein, C. J. Ocean zoning for conservation, fisheries and marine renewable energy: Assessing trade-offs and co-location opportunities. J. Environ. Manag. 152, 201–209 (2015).

Google Scholar 

André, L. V. et al. Spatial solutions and their impacts when reshuffling coastal management priorities in small islands with limited diversification opportunities. Sustainability 14, 3871 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Pınarbaşı, K. et al. Decision support tools in marine spatial planning: Present applications, gaps and future perspectives. Mar. Policy 83, 83–91 (2017).

Google Scholar 

DFFE. National Data and Information Report for Marine Spatial Planning, Knowledge Baseline for Marine Spatial Planning in South Africa. (Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment, 2021).

DFFE. Marine Spatial Planning Act, 2018 (Act No 16 of 2018): The Publication of Draft Marine Sector Plans for Public Comment. Government Gazette No. 48187. (Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment, Republic of South Africa, 2023).

Harris, L. R., Holness, S., Finke, G., Kirkman, S. & Sink, K. In Maritime Spatial Planning (eds. Zaucha, J. & Gee, K.) 71–96 (Palgrave Macmillian, Cham, 2019).

Pomeroy, R. & Douvere, F. The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Mar. Policy 32, 816–822 (2008).

Google Scholar 

Saunders, F. et al. Examining the role of integration in marine spatial planning: towards an analytical framework to understand challenges in diverse settings. Ocean Coast Manag. 169, 1–9 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Zaucha, J. & Kreiner, A. Engagement of stakeholders in the marine/maritime spatial planning process. Mar. Policy 132, 103394 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Lombard, A. T. et al. Principles for transformative ocean governance. Nat. Sustain 6, 1587–1599 (2023).

Google Scholar 

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. (R Core Team, 2024).

Harris, L. R. et al. Advancing land-sea integration for ecologically meaningful coastal conservation and management. Biol. Conserv. 237, 81–89 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Flanders Marine Institute. Maritime boundaries geodatabase: territorial seas (12NM). (2018).

Sink, K. et al. South African National Biodiversity Assessment 2018 Technical Report Volume 4: Marine Realm. (2019).

Pebesma, E. Simple features for R: standardized support for spatial vector data. R. J. 10, 439 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Pebesma, E. & Bivand, R. Spatial Data Science. (Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, 2023).

Government of South Africa. National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act, 2003 (Act No. 57 of 2003). Notice declaring the Addo Elephant Marine Protected Area in terms of section 22a of the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act, 2003 (Act No. 57 of 2003). Republic of South Africa, Government Gazette No: 42478, 757 (Government of South Africa, 2019).

Government of South Africa. National Environmental Management: Protected Areas ACT, 2003 (Act NO. 57 of 2003) Regulations for the management of the Addo Elephant National Park Marine Protected Area. Republic of South Africa, Government Gazette No: 42479, 777 (Government of South Africa, 2019).

Algoa Bay Project. Algoa Bay Systematic Conservation Plan: key places for keeping the Bay Blue for nature and people. Unpublished Technical Report, Port Elizabeth, South Africa (2019).

Punt, A. E. et al. Report of the international review panel regarding fishing closures adjacent to South Africa’s African penguin breeding colonies and declines in the penguin population (Prepared for the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE). Pretoria, South Africa: DFFE, 2023).

Convention on Biological Diversity. Decision adopted by the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity 15/4. Kunming-montreal global biodiversity framework. (2022).

Ardron, J. A., Possingham, H. P. & Klein, C. J. Marxan Good Practices Handbook, Version 2. (Pacific Marine Analysis and Research Association, Victoria, BC, Canada, 2010).

Hwang, C. L. & Yoon, K. G. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981).

Yazdi, M. topsis: TOPSIS Method for Multiple-criteria Decision Making (MCDM). R package version 1.0. (2013).

He, H. S., DeZonia, B. E. & Mladenoff, D. J. An aggregation index (AI) to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes Hong. Landsc. Ecol. 15, 591–601 (2000).

Google Scholar 

Hesselbarth, M., Sciaini, M., With, K., Wiegand, K. & Nowosad, J. Landscapemetrics: an open-source R tool to calculate landscape metrics. Ecography 42, 1648–1657 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Massie, V. et al. Proposed Sea-Based Aquaculture Development Zone in Algoa Bay, Eastern Cape—Pre-Application Basic Assessment Report in Terms of the National Environmental Management Act (107 of 1998). Report Prepared for the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Republic of South Africa. (Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Republic of South Africa, 2019).